|
|
News! PLANS wins again at 9th Circuit Court of Appeals!
Press Release
|
Welcome From PLANS President
Welcome! People for Legal and Non-Sectarian Schools (PLANS) is a world-wide network of former Waldorf parents, teachers, students, administrators and trustees who come from a variety of backgrounds with a common goal: to educate the public about the reality behind Waldorf's facade of progressive, arts-based education. Waldorf is the most visible activity of Anthroposophy, an occultist sect founded by Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925).
Together, we have performed exhaustive research on Waldorf schools and Anthroposophy, the esoteric, occult religion that both guides and inspires Waldorf teachers. PLANS affirms the right of all religious groups to practice and to teach their beliefs. But we expect those groups -- including Anthroposophy -- to tell the truth about their missionary efforts.
My personal experience with Waldorf was very confusing. Instead of the progressive and liberal alternative school I was led to expect by the school's promotional materials and staff, I discovered a rigid, authoritarian environment that seemed to be rooted in a medieval dogma that I did not understand. When, in an effort to make sense of things, I asked questions about this, I found Waldorf teachers to be strangely defensive.
I was stunned to arrive at the conclusion that the education of children -- at least as I use the term "education" -- did not seem to be the school's most important focus and objective. But what was?
I began to ask questions. What is Anthroposophy? Why don't teachers allow students in the preschool through the early elementary grades to use black crayons in their drawings? Why do students use the wet-on-wet watercolor painting technique exclusively for so many years? Why is mythology taught as history? Where is the American flag, and why don't Waldorf schools teach civics lessons in America? In a school system that promotes itself as "education toward freedom," why do students copy everything from the blackboard? Why do Waldorf teachers talk in high voices and sing-song directions to their classes? Why must the kindergarten room walls be painted "peach blossom"? Why is learning to read before the age of 8 or 9 considered unhealthy? Why do so many Waldorf classes have problems with bullying, and what is the school's policy for dealing with this? Why are teachers always lighting candles?
What answers I received were not forthright, and the teachers made it clear that my questions were not welcome. They told me, "If you understood Anthroposophy, you wouldn't be asking that question." Yet before we enrolled, I was told that the school was non-sectarian and that Anthroposophy was not "in the classroom!" I was eventually invited to leave.
Thanks to PLANS' dedicated researchers, I now have answers to all of my questions, and many more that I had not even thought of asking! If the information on the PLANS Web site had been available 9 years ago, our family would have passed by Waldorf's door, knowing that its sectarian, occultist nature was not what we were looking for after all.
My sincere hope is that the information contained in this Web site will help other families avoid a Waldorf disaster. I strongly believe parents have the right to make fully informed decisions about their children's education. Until Waldorf promoters start being honest, PLANS will be here.
Debra Snell
President
PLANS
return to top
|
|
|
Help PLANS Now!
PLANS needs your tax-deductible donations for trial expenses. Please send your check to:
PLANS, Inc.
c/o Dan Dugan, Secretary
290 Napoleon St., Studio E
San Francisco, CA 94124
Or click the box below to donate on line ($50 maximum):
|
 |
|
What they're saying about us...
Here's how Sune Nordwall describes this web site (on his web site in Sweden):
At the main page of the site of the group, it - to a first look - seems to formulate well founded criticism of Waldorf schools and Waldorf education.
But if you look closer at the site, and for a longer time follow a mailing list, personally owned by the secretary of the group, Mr. Dugan, you find that he and the group since a number of years, behind the first seemingly civil surface one encounters at its site after it engaged a professional journalist, except for badly founded criticism of Waldorf education, cultivate, publish and spread a host of defaming and demonizing myths about Waldorf education and anthroposophy as its philosophical basis.
The systematical way this is done and published at the site of the group, as a course of conduct rather than a single, isolated instance, puts the site in the hate speech category. It also puts the group in the hate-type category.
Though not as fully demonizing, it has a similar character in relation to Waldorf education and anthroposophy as the anti-Semitic group "Jew Watch" in relation to Judaism and people of Jewish origin and/or faith.
|
 |
PLANS Gathering
Former Waldorf parents, students, board members and teachers have corresponded
via e-mail for years. Some of us finally got together in Philadelphia
and New York in July, 2002. Although much of our time together was
social, we discussed some upcoming projects for PLANS. Some of us
took time to have our photo taken in front of Independence Hall.
| |
click to enlarge photo
|
Left to right: Diana Winters, Lisa Ercolano, Sharon Lombard and Debra Snell.
return to top
|
|
Education Expert Softens Support of Waldorf
Waldorf's deceptive public relations and marketing techniques often
involve publishing comments by leading mainstream educational experts
and organizations to "normalize" the Waldorf pedogogy. This technique
implies that these experts were fully informed about the underpinnings
and results of Waldorf education when they offered their supportive
comments.
One such expert, Howard Gardner of Harvard University, author of
classics including The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How
Schools Should Teach, made a statement to the Boston Globe in 2001
that is often quoted in Waldorf advertisements, web sites and printed
literature. For example, the Linden Hill Waldorf school in Wilton,
Connecticut, had this to say in a published advertisement for their
school...
"Harvard's Howard Gardner, author of several influential books (among
them The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should
Teach), sees Waldorf education as consistent with his theory of multiple
human intelligences. 'I like very much the determinedly developmental
perspective of Waldorf schools -- the realization that human development
in general, and each child's development in particular, has a kind of
organic rhythm to it, and its disturbance can be very damaging,' he says
in the Sept. 25, 2001 issue of the Boston Globe."
Since then, PLANS has had an ongoing conversation with Dr. Gardner about
his comments, providing him additional information about the Waldorf
pedagogy, and about the systematic quashing of critical discussion
between parents and the schools and on the major Waldorf internet
discussion forums, where participants who are not "positive" about
Waldorf are summarily ostracized, reprimanded and/or booted from the
discussion.
Dr. Gardner has given us permission to publish the following revision to his
earlier thoughts about Waldorf...
"Here is a brief note that you have my permission to circulate PROVIDED
THAT YOU CIRCULATE THE STATEMENT IN FULL:
I have not been a student of Waldorf Education but have known about it for
many years and have praised some of its aspects and features. I have also
been uncomfortable with some of the esoteric and pseudo-scientific concepts
that Rudolf Steiner put forth. It has recently come to my attention that
representatives of the Waldorf movement have discouraged open debate about
the merits and flaws in the Waldorf approach. Such silencing --if true--
is deplorable and calls into question the credibility of current
representatives of the movement. I encourage totally open public debate
about the Waldorf approach -- all parties will benefit from such discussion.
At the same time I must note that there are skilled as well as poor examples
of every educational innovation --Montessori, Waldorf, Dewey, Sizer etc--
and it is a mistake to judge an entire movement by only its worst, or only
its best, instantiations.
With best wishes.
Howard"
[Dr. Howard Gardner, Harvard University professor, via email to PLANS
webmaster dated September 5, 2002]
return to top
|
|
Featured Quotes
We periodically highlight interesting quotes from Rudolf Steiner, the founder of Waldorf education and Anthroposophy, and from Waldorf and Anthroposophist advocates and critics. We maintain a
large and growing collection of quotations
in the Articles section.
"You see, when we really study science and history, we must conclude that if people become increasingly strong, they will also become increasingly stupid. If the blonds and blue-eyed people die out, the human race will become increasingly dense if men do not arrive at a form of intelligence that is independent of blondness. Blond hair actually bestows intelligence. ... It is indeed true that the more the fair individuals die out the more will the instinctive wisdom of humans vanish."
[Rudolf Steiner, founder of Waldorf Schools. Health and Illness: Volume I, p86. (1922) Spring Valley: Anthroposophic Press, 1981]
"It can certainly not be denied, that today Jewry still appears as a closed totality, and as such many times has intervened in the development of the present situation in a way that has been less than positive for Western cultural ideas. But Jewry as such has long since outlived itself, and has no justification any more within modern life of the peoples, and that it nevertheless has preserved itself is a mistake of world history, whose consequences have been inevitable."
[Rudolf Steiner, founder of Waldorf Schools. from his review of "Homunculus" by Hammerling (1888) published in the German Weekly]
return to top
|
|
Send feedback:
or report technical problems:
|
|
|